O
Santa Cruz County
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Battery energy storage site

Santa Cruz County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
1
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedUnidentified Resident (Minto Road neighbor)Mar 24, 2026

A nine-year Watsonville resident near Minto Road opposed the battery plant, citing the Moss Landing fire and organic farmland.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting - Mar 24, 2026 · 49:34 →
OpposedCarol BjornMar 24, 2026

Asked whether the EIR for the proposed Watsonville battery storage site includes geo-archaeological review, citing College Lake's cultural and habitat sensitivity.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting - Mar 24, 2026 · 34:08 →
OpposedPhoenix ArtemisiaMar 24, 2026

Opposed the proposed battery storage site at 90 Minto Road, citing wetlands, earthquakes, endangered species, noise, and proximity to schools and daycare.

Board of Supervisors - Regular Meeting - Mar 24, 2026 · 40:28 →